Nicole Junkermann, a confirmed associate of Jeffrey Epstein, Elon Musk, Peter Thiel and Ehud Barak has spent 6 years using lawyers to delete my journalism. Will Substack reinstate them?
They've been taken over for a while now already. And, without a doubt, they will inevitably soon implement more censorship mechanisms, specifically age verification measures to access contents.
Substack authors: prepare your Plan B platform for your writings & podcasts accordingly.
Absolutely, in fact, I shut down my SS post pages a few months back ….nearly two years of hard work and lots of hours writing, recording messages, owing to the inner guidance that the infiltration had already begun.
I only post when guided.
Otherwise, I stay offline. There is nowhere else to go because every platform is already compromised and designed to control.
The Bitchute video from Ray V. about "censorship was necessary" is all part of the psy-op.
They serve the Cult agenda. It was a done deal.
There were too many voices on there pointing too many uncomfortable truths. Many did not leave BC, just found another go-around, but I am sure that they will be blocked soon enough.
My advice is: download everything, keep it on several memory sticks but not a Lacie or similar because they frequently break and one can lose one's work.
Also, print off your most valued articles/work.
Self publish if necessary.
The book burning rituals of old are coming to the internet, as Artificial Intelligence determines who can speak and who must be silenced.
I have been censored for years. I think my work threatens their plans so I take it as a huge compliment that my efforts are helping to weaken this group.
Spot on comment Claire. Sorry to hear you have been experiencing these things. I just recently published a podcast deep-diving into SS's funny business and apparent takeover:
- Episode 38. Is Substack now suppressing Conservative/ Contrarian Voices while Amplifying Democrat/Liberal ones? w/Bill Rice Jr.
Thank you for your kind comments and for the links. I will visit them all and take a peak, I have also restacked your links as I have friends who will also be very interested in your research. Many thanks!
I very often archive them at archive.ph or archive.is. But keep in mind that certain, usually highly sensitive, pages won't archive on these platforms giving some bogus errors. Saving/printing them as PDF is another way to preserve them. And sometimes, even just doing multiple screenshots of these sites can be a way to record them for posterity. Though these two methods don't necessarily 100% prove of their prior existence, they can prove valuable nonetheless.
Agreed. PDF helps greatly for personal use. I was look at the immediacy for those that need a receipt. Another way: Create a social media thread (Twitter) then at threadreaderapp unroll to create an html page. Takes more time - publication wise - but at least its another storage placeholder.
Its shit Johnny. I used to think bullies always got their comeuppance but in the tech world money really does talk. Hence why no major platform is a defender of freedom speech & truth. They are controlled. They give a good impression of what they are not. But people are wising up.
Maybe set up a secondary account as a backup. I know it more work but the game is to be played, even if the competition is not playing fair.
That or send out your articles via email and bollocks to the alt media platforms.
And yes, I fully understand the financial impacts.
But don't give up, there isn't enough good people doing this valuable work.
I had similar happen to one of my articles. I was away on holiday on a remote island in the Pacific and I didn't see the email from substack until I got back by which time I was threatened with legal action. The legal action never happened and I found out the Irish tech individual who claimed defamation does it to anyone who writes about him while running numerous fake accounts on social media. I am going to explore links to junkerman from the crews I've been investigating. I am sure they are linked.
“I have a good faith belief that the material was removed or disabled as a result of mistake or misidentification of the material to be removed or disabled.”
That’s actually a legal declaration which must be made in those terms when responding to the DMCA. It’s a requirement. However, I think many of these actors are totally disingenuous. I hope that @substack defends freedom of the press. However, I’ve had a lot of experience of being let down.
Tsk tsk slow in censure SlobSlap. Luckily your Junkermann articles are archived in immutable places, although it's a shame that the conspiracy-addicted audiences here can't be exposed to your earliest investigative masterpieces.
Smells like a case of "Malicious Prosecution with intent to intimidate or harass".
The lawyers can lose their license as well as a pile of $ for damages. Sometimes the best defense is offense. And if ya team up with the others they are targeting you have the power of class action.
But that's not "legal advice" because I am not an attorney... and most BAR attorneys will never use this option... because they are all "officers of the court"...
As I am also threatened by the Countess who demanded that my post about her was removed recently, I felt triggered to find out what she is up to right now. My spidey sense tells me that whatever it is must be super sensitive for her to crawl out of her sewer to attack us both again.
Sure enough, without much difficulty I was able to identify the latest sleaze.
A highly suspect individual, with a dubious educational history, mostly bought and/or faked, Pablo Casado, a Spanish politician and former leader of the People's Party, has partnered with Nicole Junkermann in a venture related to a cybersecurity investment fund launched in 2024.
This fund, which targets defence and artificial intelligence sectors, has a total capacity of 150 million euros and includes an international advisory board featuring Junkermann among other prominent figures. (check out how eye-wateringly prominent they are in the link below)
The fund's key investor is the Nortia family office, a shareholder in several companies including Sacyr, Merlin, and Arcano, as well as fund managers Q-energy, McWin, Serena, and Seaya, where Nortia is the lead investor alongside Iberdrola and the Andrómeda fund.
Well done with your reply letter to Substack Johnny. Please keep us updated on their counter-reply and/or any actions these parasitical complainant parties take. Best of luck my friend.
I spent some ten years as vice-chair of a a a Polish company that was involved in domestic military sales and sales to/from Russia, China, India and others
We developed some rules to prevent us from going off the deep end in conspiracy theories. Rule number one: all Israelis,if not Mossad directly, had Mossad on their speed dials. Rule number two: CIA is so compartmentalized that different departments would “support’ conflicting end games just to see which would/could prevail. Rule number 3: DEI only straight-shooting part of US intelligence network. Serious players concentrate on capabilities of participants and what is needed to complement those capabilities. Of course everyone wants access to everything, but that is mostly a distraction. After reading my only regret is that I never met Ms. Junkermann who seems really “:hot”
The writing is on the wall re Substack.
They've been taken over for a while now already. And, without a doubt, they will inevitably soon implement more censorship mechanisms, specifically age verification measures to access contents.
Substack authors: prepare your Plan B platform for your writings & podcasts accordingly.
Absolutely, in fact, I shut down my SS post pages a few months back ….nearly two years of hard work and lots of hours writing, recording messages, owing to the inner guidance that the infiltration had already begun.
I only post when guided.
Otherwise, I stay offline. There is nowhere else to go because every platform is already compromised and designed to control.
The Bitchute video from Ray V. about "censorship was necessary" is all part of the psy-op.
They serve the Cult agenda. It was a done deal.
There were too many voices on there pointing too many uncomfortable truths. Many did not leave BC, just found another go-around, but I am sure that they will be blocked soon enough.
My advice is: download everything, keep it on several memory sticks but not a Lacie or similar because they frequently break and one can lose one's work.
Also, print off your most valued articles/work.
Self publish if necessary.
The book burning rituals of old are coming to the internet, as Artificial Intelligence determines who can speak and who must be silenced.
I have been censored for years. I think my work threatens their plans so I take it as a huge compliment that my efforts are helping to weaken this group.
This means you have been "hovering over the target", Claire.
100%
Thank you both for the comments.
Spot on comment Claire. Sorry to hear you have been experiencing these things. I just recently published a podcast deep-diving into SS's funny business and apparent takeover:
- Episode 38. Is Substack now suppressing Conservative/ Contrarian Voices while Amplifying Democrat/Liberal ones? w/Bill Rice Jr.
https://fournier.substack.com/p/38-is-substack-now-suppressing-conservative
I'll probably ride the tricycle until the wheels come off but also have my Plan B (on NOSRT/Primal, see https://primal.net/p/npub1thhfcrj0shrg7t9qw22d8gcf6a59lxg7fd7mc7zjyaq900wa4cuq0l4zdh) and am working on my Plan C.
I always archive my SS articles (as well as other ones I find will likely be memory-holed) at archive.ph.
Thank you for your kind comments and for the links. I will visit them all and take a peak, I have also restacked your links as I have friends who will also be very interested in your research. Many thanks!
"Substack, tell us it ain't so!"
Don't hold your breath.
Minor suggestion: always archive.is these key historical items.
I just checked a couple - not archived. Sometimes, archive.org populates correctly.
I even fail to do it with my dives - but not as high profile as your digs are.
Appreciate your work.
https://web.archive.org/web/20241104135632/https://newspaste.substack.com/p/musk-and-epstein-the-third-culture
I very often archive them at archive.ph or archive.is. But keep in mind that certain, usually highly sensitive, pages won't archive on these platforms giving some bogus errors. Saving/printing them as PDF is another way to preserve them. And sometimes, even just doing multiple screenshots of these sites can be a way to record them for posterity. Though these two methods don't necessarily 100% prove of their prior existence, they can prove valuable nonetheless.
Agreed. PDF helps greatly for personal use. I was look at the immediacy for those that need a receipt. Another way: Create a social media thread (Twitter) then at threadreaderapp unroll to create an html page. Takes more time - publication wise - but at least its another storage placeholder.
Good ideas. Thanks. Also is the first I have heard of the archive sites.
https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/web-archives
https://archiveweb.page/
Thanks for your post.
Thanks for this information.
Its shit Johnny. I used to think bullies always got their comeuppance but in the tech world money really does talk. Hence why no major platform is a defender of freedom speech & truth. They are controlled. They give a good impression of what they are not. But people are wising up.
Maybe set up a secondary account as a backup. I know it more work but the game is to be played, even if the competition is not playing fair.
That or send out your articles via email and bollocks to the alt media platforms.
And yes, I fully understand the financial impacts.
But don't give up, there isn't enough good people doing this valuable work.
I had similar happen to one of my articles. I was away on holiday on a remote island in the Pacific and I didn't see the email from substack until I got back by which time I was threatened with legal action. The legal action never happened and I found out the Irish tech individual who claimed defamation does it to anyone who writes about him while running numerous fake accounts on social media. I am going to explore links to junkerman from the crews I've been investigating. I am sure they are linked.
I have experienced comments being deleted just before publishing on substack. I therefore feel It is not safer than other platforms.
“I have a good faith belief that the material was removed or disabled as a result of mistake or misidentification of the material to be removed or disabled.”
Not on the same level, but… from my experience, Substack doesn’t make “mistakes” (even if that’s what they call it): https://ifrqfm.substack.com/p/your-writing-is-not-safe-on-substack
That’s actually a legal declaration which must be made in those terms when responding to the DMCA. It’s a requirement. However, I think many of these actors are totally disingenuous. I hope that @substack defends freedom of the press. However, I’ve had a lot of experience of being let down.
Tsk tsk slow in censure SlobSlap. Luckily your Junkermann articles are archived in immutable places, although it's a shame that the conspiracy-addicted audiences here can't be exposed to your earliest investigative masterpieces.
One is obviously covered by "Fair Use". Any © lawyer knows that, so to proceed regardless is suspect...?
Smells like a case of "Malicious Prosecution with intent to intimidate or harass".
The lawyers can lose their license as well as a pile of $ for damages. Sometimes the best defense is offense. And if ya team up with the others they are targeting you have the power of class action.
But that's not "legal advice" because I am not an attorney... and most BAR attorneys will never use this option... because they are all "officers of the court"...
As I am also threatened by the Countess who demanded that my post about her was removed recently, I felt triggered to find out what she is up to right now. My spidey sense tells me that whatever it is must be super sensitive for her to crawl out of her sewer to attack us both again.
Sure enough, without much difficulty I was able to identify the latest sleaze.
A highly suspect individual, with a dubious educational history, mostly bought and/or faked, Pablo Casado, a Spanish politician and former leader of the People's Party, has partnered with Nicole Junkermann in a venture related to a cybersecurity investment fund launched in 2024.
This fund, which targets defence and artificial intelligence sectors, has a total capacity of 150 million euros and includes an international advisory board featuring Junkermann among other prominent figures. (check out how eye-wateringly prominent they are in the link below)
The fund's key investor is the Nortia family office, a shareholder in several companies including Sacyr, Merlin, and Arcano, as well as fund managers Q-energy, McWin, Serena, and Seaya, where Nortia is the lead investor alongside Iberdrola and the Andrómeda fund.
https://nortia.com/en/press-room/pablo-casado-and-ana-botins-nephew-join-forces-to-launch-a-150-million-euro-fund-in-defence-and-ai/
Oof.
Well done with your reply letter to Substack Johnny. Please keep us updated on their counter-reply and/or any actions these parasitical complainant parties take. Best of luck my friend.
So they did it. Wow. Fuck these tech companies for real.
I hope to see you in Heaven my friend. I KNOW that you will be there. I may just get lucky!
Restacked and a big Chapeau! to you.
Money talks, the rest of us walk. Keep walking.
The Epstein web is sticky, and dark.
I see that she also seems to be involved in agrotech - drone usage, lab-grown meat etc.. A Gates-clone technocrat, clearly.
Too much information.
lol
Way too much.
Even I can figure out what is happening.
And why.
And mostly long before I finished the article.
Good job.
Keep mirrors in every room, trust me.
I spent some ten years as vice-chair of a a a Polish company that was involved in domestic military sales and sales to/from Russia, China, India and others
We developed some rules to prevent us from going off the deep end in conspiracy theories. Rule number one: all Israelis,if not Mossad directly, had Mossad on their speed dials. Rule number two: CIA is so compartmentalized that different departments would “support’ conflicting end games just to see which would/could prevail. Rule number 3: DEI only straight-shooting part of US intelligence network. Serious players concentrate on capabilities of participants and what is needed to complement those capabilities. Of course everyone wants access to everything, but that is mostly a distraction. After reading my only regret is that I never met Ms. Junkermann who seems really “:hot”