The White House is only telling half the story. The US medical elite outsourced the COVID cover-up to an elite band of scientists with close ties to the Royal Society.
Wow, great presentation of a lot of important background information to the history, players and agendas!
I know it was already long and space, attention constraints left out other important considerations. So I'll take the liberty of adding more to the story.
Wellcome Trust spun up a psychological operation, information and narrative in the 2010's, called "LEAP." Staffed it with leaders who were former DARPA PsyOp agents and leaders in the US and their UK counterparts. Controlling the public mind is an essential component of an Information War. Which is the preferred warfare method in the Information Age. Kinetic war being so messy and all. Much info is publicly available on LEAP, that's homework for the curious.
Another essential component for the success of any major operation that produces a loss of rights and freedom is the belief that those who are taking rights away from others, harming others, are doing it in service to good. A greater good. Despite our many failings as a species most aren't sadistic trying to harm others. But...will harm others if we believe it's in service to the many.
Enter the field of Ethics. Bioethics, specifically. And Wellcome Trust also spun up a Bioethics arm - Nuffield Bioethics Council several decades ago. Where collectivist authoritarianism is given cover, employing Utilitarian ethics to rationalize and justify taking individual rights away, even harming others, for a "greater good." As determined by a "consensus" of those invited into the room. A consensus of Marxists will be very different than a consensus of liberty minded.
By assuaging consciouses those who are taking away individual rights and harming others feel virtuous in doing so. Like the former Chief Bioethicist at the NIH in the US, Christine Grady, aka Mrs. Anthony Fauci.
And to add more history and context I invite you to go on a Magic Carpet Ride reading my Stack from a few years ago that contains a discussion about Bioethics and pandemics that reveal much more information about Pardis Sabeti. And many other important and interesting names.
In the Stack you'll learn who her father is: Parviz Sabeti. The Shah of Iran's top Secret Police leader. Who headed up SAVAK, responsible for the Stasi-like complete surveillance, torture and murder of political opponents and those with anti-Shah leanings. He was "the most feared man in Iran" under the Shah. And worked closely with the CIA and USAID. When the Shah fell he was given sanctuary in the US. And his family, daughter were provided with the comforts and opportunities of a gilded life that produced her. She's followed in her father's footsteps surveilling and torturing, killing the population. But in a more technologically advanced way. That matches the Information Age warfare on the mind using computers and media. And uses biological methods of torture and murder.
It's a massive operation. PsyOp. A conspiracy fact, not just a theory.
"What should be even more concerning is that these men have often appeared to be expecting and preparing for these events to happen beforehand and are hoisted quickly into key positions to act as the vanguard to responses which should only be the remit of elected officials rather than so-called “philanthropists”."
I hold you in great esteem Johnny and have done for many years. However, I am a bit surprised that you have not seen beyond the narratives and discovered precisely how these men of the Royal Society knew in advance that a health crisis was imminent.
Since 2016 I have been researching and compiling an archive on the roll out of telecommunications. I believe that it was obvious that a health crisis would occur with the roll out of 5G.
I think they make the health crises happen. I can't tell you which of the thousand cuts is the worse, but I am reticent to blame it on just one thing. My research suggests death by a thousand cuts rather than one main cause bundled up into a proverbial shark which can be harpooned to save us all. I think 5G is just one of many factors, The tools to achieve Fabian ends are many and layered so that one weaponised tactic can be removed and it's affect is barely noticed.
I will happily check out what you've done, though.
Since the virologist are claiming there theory as fact, it is up to them to prove that there agent called “ virus” has been isolated, is replication competent and can be introduced into a human and causes illness. They have tried to make humans sick and every attempt has failed. They have successfully disproved their theory. The isolation(separate from everything else)has never been done.
You are wrong about the starting point of SARSCOV2 (Covid19).
It wasn't Edward C Holmes who, as you say, originated "the translation of the original SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequence on 11 January 2020"
Holmes didn't translate squat.
The genomic sequence for SARSCOV2 (covid19) was the brainchild of a Chinaman by the name of Zhang Yongzhen.
The reason it's important to get this fact straight, is because if you carefully read and understand the paper Zhang wrote in which he lays out his genomic sequence you will understand the sequence he put out is bullshit.
Zhang sold that bullshit sequence to Holmes who then, sanctified the sequence using his worldwide contacts. They, in turn megaphoned it to all their virologist buddies. They, intern, megaphoned it to their buddies and on and on ending with masks, 6 foot spacing, business closures, etc., etc.. Oh, and yea, you get vaccines that insert bullshit into peoples arms. That then leads to all kinds of weird statistics about the people who had the bullshit inserted in their arm. These people had seizures, those people had miscarriages, those people had whatever could be associated to this thing now sanctified as covid19.
Through it all, there is this insidious test which, to this day, continues to sustain the life of covid - the RT-PCR test. Itself a bullshit test, at least if you believe the inventor of the test, Kery Mullis. He says it's a bullshit test for diagnostic purposes. In the world of covid, that's all it's used for. And, to boot, claimed to be the "gold standard' proving covid exists.
I never said that Eddie Holmes transcribed the genomic sequence, I said he translated it. I actually said: "He is also the scientist who released the translated genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 on 11 January 2020." Zhang transcribed the sequence in Chinese on the 10th January and Eddie Holmes translated the sequence into English. That's why I use the word "translated". Translation is defined as : "The act or process of translating, especially from one language into another."
I am aware about Zhang, but this article is on the involvement of the British contingent.
You, like so many others, are looking for the"proximal origin" of some downstream effect of the invention called covid.
Once covid was set in motion as I've described it, the downstream effects, including your British Royal Society involvement, are, for all intents and purposes, red herrings. Which lead away from the truth.
The British Royal Society you seem to despise wrote the following:
"The public needs to be empowered to spot and report
misinformation, with more accountability for media
companies to remove harmful information and legal
consequences for individuals or groups that spread
misinformation."
Specifically, the British Royal Society wants you to ignore the "misinformation" these two men are trying to get out - Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Thomas Cowan. Find them and read what they know and Zhang will become a more interesting character.
Firstly, I was correct about Edward Holmes and his work, secondly my only strike on YouTube is because I interviewed Andrew Kaufman regardless of the consequences, and although I agree with him on many things, I don't agree with him on other things. This article isn't about Terrain theory or Zhang so they had no place in the article. You want me to shoehorn in whatever you want wherever you think you can. That's not how you make your point.
You shouldn't start off by telling someone that they're wrong about something when they're right, and then expect them to think you know best with what you say next. You need to work on how you communicate.
One of the few heroes in this Sarscov2 scheme is a scientist by the name of Zheng Li Shi, a female. You might remember her as being tagged as the bat lady and vilified as the one who released covid from her Wuhan lab.
But did you know Nature Magazine published her genomic sequence for Sarscov2 on the same day as Holmes’s buddy, Yong Zhen, published his, February 3, 2020.
So, both of them were running neck and neck to get their sequence out but Yong Zhen won that race.
Know why? Because in her report in Nature Magazine she included this comment:
“However, there are still many urgent questions that remain to be answered. The association between 2019-nCoV and the disease has not been verified by animal experiments to fulfil the Koch’s postulates to establish a causative relationship between a microorganism and a disease.”
She dared to invoke the need for Koch’s postulates to prove the existence of Sarscov2. Honesty. Do that and your dead meat in virology land.
She became the first Covid denier. And disappeared from public view shortly thereafter. Want to be a covid denier? Then the gravy train is over. Get ready to lose your paycheck.
I think Zheng-Li Shi knew what was coming but did it anyway. The girl has guts and it deserves to be recognized.
I think you're right. I am trying to shoehorn my subject matter in here. But the covid control system you describe needs a starting point to make sense. Without a starting point, the effort amounts to flailing getting nowhere. Similar to the flailing that occurs in the debate about whether covid was from a lab leak or from
I know what people say but I got it when I was working on a front desk and a delivery guy literally leaned over the counter and sneezed in my mouth as I yawned. I was sick by the next day so I have a hard time believing the "no virus" line. I'm sympathetic to it though. I accept I could be proven wrong, but I've talked to the likes of Andrew Kaufman and others and am still yet to be convinced.
What would be the opposite of that challenge? So, naturally, I should reverse your own question.:
What evidence do you have for terrain theory? I'm happy to discuss either. My only strike on YouTube is for speaking with Kaufman. I wasn't convinced because I don't see the evidence. I won't accept theories or logical fallacies. But I'd like you to say something that can convince me in the same way as your challenge is attempting to do. I'm open to listening. So far, nothing has persuaded me.
But Terrain isn’t a theory any more than No Santa Evidence is a theory. It’s the people with the invented story that have to demonstrate it has anything to do with reality.
I don’t have to prove Santa doesn’t exist in order to demonstrate that no evidence for his existence has ever surfaced. Santa is fictional by definition - because he exists in stories with no real world evidence for his existence.
The same is true of the recent quack fraud invention of Germ Theory pretty recently.
Bacteria do exist. It’s their attacking of healthy tissue that is fictional (by the above definition)
Viruses are just pure fiction in all respects - existing only as manufactured in silico ‘genomes’..
There’s a fantastic 5 and a half hour full dismantling of virology here
Thankyou and bless you Johnny for sharing your insights on these issues. It is beautiful to see the divine inspiration work through you.
As we travel down this path of understanding together and the veil falls away it is appearing a lot less likely that AIDS was naturally occurring and more likely another manufactured tool in the depopulation tool kit....and as you mentioned... What else?
When we look at the medical industry from this altitude the serpentine nature is much more apparent. The power. The wealth. The prestige. These are all cold blooded pursuits of the heartless/Godless. Psychopathic. Our present situation is understandable with these demons as "leaders". Truth is the enemy of the house of lies. Thankyou for arming us. Xx
Incredible article Johnny!…once you move on from the UK can you do Canada? Wouldn’t surprise me if your “distinguished “ scientists were counselling our government in our Privy Council…after all we are your minions lol
Your government is probably the slimiest government on Earth. Did you read my article on Mark Carney? I suppose you probably did. I do want to spend some time on more Canadian stuff. One of my future articles will have its foot in Canada, too.
I'll have a look, but I also think the evidence that it came from China is overwhelming, and there is extra circumstantial evidence which also backs it up. I do think I had COVID in an early wave, and it was like nothing else I'd had. I came down with it the day after a man sneezed in my mouth, and when it happened, I accepted it as cause and consequence because it was so directly associated. I didn't take the vaccines, and I got ill during the supposed omicron wave. too. To be perfectly honest, neither side of this debate has convinced me of even half of what they believe. Most people tend to use clear logical fallacies instead of actual logic.
Yes, DO look in to Dr. David Martin. There's no shortage of his stuff (vids), that's out there.
Matters not that someone 'sneezed into your mouth', there is NO SUCH THING as 'viruses'. Dr. Lee Merritt has gone over this fact, just as MANY other (REAL) Doctors have. And that is what *I* learned, during the FAKE PLANNEDemic/Fake 'virus' PsyOp.....that there was no such thing as a 'virus'.
Thank you so much for this article - I have cited the original many times, in many contexts, the most important of which is the Covid Dossier, which is a record of the global military-intelligence coordination of the Covid event. Your research is invaluable and much appreciated!
I have. I've interviewed Kaufman, had many conversations with people like Bill Huston. But none of them have convinced me of anything. I'm still open, but saying "investigate some more" is a use of a logical fallacy. I'm probably not going to be convinced by either side because the current arguments are based solely on believing that one side is wrong, ergo, the other must be right, rather than developing a more coherent theory or any evidence whatsoever.
Wow, great presentation of a lot of important background information to the history, players and agendas!
I know it was already long and space, attention constraints left out other important considerations. So I'll take the liberty of adding more to the story.
Wellcome Trust spun up a psychological operation, information and narrative in the 2010's, called "LEAP." Staffed it with leaders who were former DARPA PsyOp agents and leaders in the US and their UK counterparts. Controlling the public mind is an essential component of an Information War. Which is the preferred warfare method in the Information Age. Kinetic war being so messy and all. Much info is publicly available on LEAP, that's homework for the curious.
Another essential component for the success of any major operation that produces a loss of rights and freedom is the belief that those who are taking rights away from others, harming others, are doing it in service to good. A greater good. Despite our many failings as a species most aren't sadistic trying to harm others. But...will harm others if we believe it's in service to the many.
Enter the field of Ethics. Bioethics, specifically. And Wellcome Trust also spun up a Bioethics arm - Nuffield Bioethics Council several decades ago. Where collectivist authoritarianism is given cover, employing Utilitarian ethics to rationalize and justify taking individual rights away, even harming others, for a "greater good." As determined by a "consensus" of those invited into the room. A consensus of Marxists will be very different than a consensus of liberty minded.
By assuaging consciouses those who are taking away individual rights and harming others feel virtuous in doing so. Like the former Chief Bioethicist at the NIH in the US, Christine Grady, aka Mrs. Anthony Fauci.
And to add more history and context I invite you to go on a Magic Carpet Ride reading my Stack from a few years ago that contains a discussion about Bioethics and pandemics that reveal much more information about Pardis Sabeti. And many other important and interesting names.
https://freedomfox.substack.com/p/step-in-foxs-magic-carpet-ride
In the Stack you'll learn who her father is: Parviz Sabeti. The Shah of Iran's top Secret Police leader. Who headed up SAVAK, responsible for the Stasi-like complete surveillance, torture and murder of political opponents and those with anti-Shah leanings. He was "the most feared man in Iran" under the Shah. And worked closely with the CIA and USAID. When the Shah fell he was given sanctuary in the US. And his family, daughter were provided with the comforts and opportunities of a gilded life that produced her. She's followed in her father's footsteps surveilling and torturing, killing the population. But in a more technologically advanced way. That matches the Information Age warfare on the mind using computers and media. And uses biological methods of torture and murder.
It's a massive operation. PsyOp. A conspiracy fact, not just a theory.
I wrote about some of this on Unlimited Hangout in an article with Whitney Webb. https://x.com/BotWebb/status/1411371037275602944
Even though my contribution is only noted at the bottom, I helped research and write this article related to that podcast: https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/06/investigative-reports/a-leap-toward-humanitys-destruction/
I definitely appreciate the input.
"What should be even more concerning is that these men have often appeared to be expecting and preparing for these events to happen beforehand and are hoisted quickly into key positions to act as the vanguard to responses which should only be the remit of elected officials rather than so-called “philanthropists”."
I hold you in great esteem Johnny and have done for many years. However, I am a bit surprised that you have not seen beyond the narratives and discovered precisely how these men of the Royal Society knew in advance that a health crisis was imminent.
Since 2016 I have been researching and compiling an archive on the roll out of telecommunications. I believe that it was obvious that a health crisis would occur with the roll out of 5G.
THE ROYAL SOCIETY KNEW IT WITHOUT A DOUBT.
You can find my huge archive here: https://francesleader.substack.com/p/all-my-substack-articles-on-emfc19
And a quick overview and summary here: https://francesleader.substack.com/p/the-fifth-generation-weapon
I think they make the health crises happen. I can't tell you which of the thousand cuts is the worse, but I am reticent to blame it on just one thing. My research suggests death by a thousand cuts rather than one main cause bundled up into a proverbial shark which can be harpooned to save us all. I think 5G is just one of many factors, The tools to achieve Fabian ends are many and layered so that one weaponised tactic can be removed and it's affect is barely noticed.
I will happily check out what you've done, though.
Strangely, that is what most people say to me. I am not convinced that the international crime syndicate is as intelligent as everyone assumes.
doesnt necessarily matter tho, as the public are not especially smart these days :( . Waking up tho, that's for sure :) .
Omg! There are NO infectious agents! What is labelled biological agent is a poison/poisons.
It’s good that you are exposing the evil in this world but stop giving them your power!
Someone has to prove that to me because I see both theories as almost unprovable.
Since the virologist are claiming there theory as fact, it is up to them to prove that there agent called “ virus” has been isolated, is replication competent and can be introduced into a human and causes illness. They have tried to make humans sick and every attempt has failed. They have successfully disproved their theory. The isolation(separate from everything else)has never been done.
You are wrong about the starting point of SARSCOV2 (Covid19).
It wasn't Edward C Holmes who, as you say, originated "the translation of the original SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequence on 11 January 2020"
Holmes didn't translate squat.
The genomic sequence for SARSCOV2 (covid19) was the brainchild of a Chinaman by the name of Zhang Yongzhen.
The reason it's important to get this fact straight, is because if you carefully read and understand the paper Zhang wrote in which he lays out his genomic sequence you will understand the sequence he put out is bullshit.
Zhang sold that bullshit sequence to Holmes who then, sanctified the sequence using his worldwide contacts. They, in turn megaphoned it to all their virologist buddies. They, intern, megaphoned it to their buddies and on and on ending with masks, 6 foot spacing, business closures, etc., etc.. Oh, and yea, you get vaccines that insert bullshit into peoples arms. That then leads to all kinds of weird statistics about the people who had the bullshit inserted in their arm. These people had seizures, those people had miscarriages, those people had whatever could be associated to this thing now sanctified as covid19.
Through it all, there is this insidious test which, to this day, continues to sustain the life of covid - the RT-PCR test. Itself a bullshit test, at least if you believe the inventor of the test, Kery Mullis. He says it's a bullshit test for diagnostic purposes. In the world of covid, that's all it's used for. And, to boot, claimed to be the "gold standard' proving covid exists.
https://time.com/5882918/zhang-yongzhen-interview-china-coronavirus-genome/
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2008-3
I never said that Eddie Holmes transcribed the genomic sequence, I said he translated it. I actually said: "He is also the scientist who released the translated genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 on 11 January 2020." Zhang transcribed the sequence in Chinese on the 10th January and Eddie Holmes translated the sequence into English. That's why I use the word "translated". Translation is defined as : "The act or process of translating, especially from one language into another."
I am aware about Zhang, but this article is on the involvement of the British contingent.
You are not aware of Zhang.
You, like so many others, are looking for the"proximal origin" of some downstream effect of the invention called covid.
Once covid was set in motion as I've described it, the downstream effects, including your British Royal Society involvement, are, for all intents and purposes, red herrings. Which lead away from the truth.
The British Royal Society you seem to despise wrote the following:
"The public needs to be empowered to spot and report
misinformation, with more accountability for media
companies to remove harmful information and legal
consequences for individuals or groups that spread
misinformation."
Specifically, the British Royal Society wants you to ignore the "misinformation" these two men are trying to get out - Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Thomas Cowan. Find them and read what they know and Zhang will become a more interesting character.
Firstly, I was correct about Edward Holmes and his work, secondly my only strike on YouTube is because I interviewed Andrew Kaufman regardless of the consequences, and although I agree with him on many things, I don't agree with him on other things. This article isn't about Terrain theory or Zhang so they had no place in the article. You want me to shoehorn in whatever you want wherever you think you can. That's not how you make your point.
You shouldn't start off by telling someone that they're wrong about something when they're right, and then expect them to think you know best with what you say next. You need to work on how you communicate.
One of the few heroes in this Sarscov2 scheme is a scientist by the name of Zheng Li Shi, a female. You might remember her as being tagged as the bat lady and vilified as the one who released covid from her Wuhan lab.
But did you know Nature Magazine published her genomic sequence for Sarscov2 on the same day as Holmes’s buddy, Yong Zhen, published his, February 3, 2020.
So, both of them were running neck and neck to get their sequence out but Yong Zhen won that race.
Know why? Because in her report in Nature Magazine she included this comment:
“However, there are still many urgent questions that remain to be answered. The association between 2019-nCoV and the disease has not been verified by animal experiments to fulfil the Koch’s postulates to establish a causative relationship between a microorganism and a disease.”
She dared to invoke the need for Koch’s postulates to prove the existence of Sarscov2. Honesty. Do that and your dead meat in virology land.
She became the first Covid denier. And disappeared from public view shortly thereafter. Want to be a covid denier? Then the gravy train is over. Get ready to lose your paycheck.
I think Zheng-Li Shi knew what was coming but did it anyway. The girl has guts and it deserves to be recognized.
I think you're right. I am trying to shoehorn my subject matter in here. But the covid control system you describe needs a starting point to make sense. Without a starting point, the effort amounts to flailing getting nowhere. Similar to the flailing that occurs in the debate about whether covid was from a lab leak or from
nature.
There was no virus Johnny. It was all narrative
I know what people say but I got it when I was working on a front desk and a delivery guy literally leaned over the counter and sneezed in my mouth as I yawned. I was sick by the next day so I have a hard time believing the "no virus" line. I'm sympathetic to it though. I accept I could be proven wrong, but I've talked to the likes of Andrew Kaufman and others and am still yet to be convinced.
I offer £10,000 pretty much every day and have done for years now.
For any evidence any infectious biological pathogen has ever existed.
All major medical freedom fighters still advocating Germ Theory have had the offer.
Of course nobody has offered any evidence because no such evidence exists.
Germ theory is a very recent fairytale .
6000 years and it wasn’t ‘noticed’.
In terms of your experience I’d like to point to the history of scurvy - considered an infectious disease for 50 years.
And also to the work of William B Cannon
There’s a video in his work at the end of this
https://open.substack.com/pub/drmikeyeadon/p/but-i-was-ill-what-else-could-it?r=j4u5j&utm_medium=ios
What would be the opposite of that challenge? So, naturally, I should reverse your own question.:
What evidence do you have for terrain theory? I'm happy to discuss either. My only strike on YouTube is for speaking with Kaufman. I wasn't convinced because I don't see the evidence. I won't accept theories or logical fallacies. But I'd like you to say something that can convince me in the same way as your challenge is attempting to do. I'm open to listening. So far, nothing has persuaded me.
Sorry Johnny - just read the end of your reply
I will make it my business to do a post directly aimed at pointing to stuff that turns anyone’s heads from the pathogen story in less than 20 minutes
Bottom line is - my £10,000 is safe. I have looked so hard and so have many others. ‘Contagion’ makes the Manchester Bombing look real
I too am rigorous about keeping green stuff and pink stuff clearly separate. https://open.substack.com/pub/beyondcertainty/p/science-the-avoidance-of-delusion?r=j4u5j&utm_medium=ios
But Terrain isn’t a theory any more than No Santa Evidence is a theory. It’s the people with the invented story that have to demonstrate it has anything to do with reality.
I don’t have to prove Santa doesn’t exist in order to demonstrate that no evidence for his existence has ever surfaced. Santa is fictional by definition - because he exists in stories with no real world evidence for his existence.
The same is true of the recent quack fraud invention of Germ Theory pretty recently.
Bacteria do exist. It’s their attacking of healthy tissue that is fictional (by the above definition)
Viruses are just pure fiction in all respects - existing only as manufactured in silico ‘genomes’..
There’s a fantastic 5 and a half hour full dismantling of virology here
All dealt with here. The Fan Wu covered
Part 1
https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/viruses-unplugged/a-farewell-to-virology-part-one/
Part 2 in
https://open.substack.com/pub/drsambailey/p/a-farewell-to-virology-part-two-dr
Part 3
https://open.substack.com/pub/drsambailey/p/a-farewell-to-virology-part-3-drw
EVERYONE thinks it is ludicrous to question ‘contagion’ and ‘pathogens’ at first.
But everyone who looks at the hard evidence soon thinks it’s ludicrous this delusion has gained such traction.
In terms of the ‘Lab leak’ Psyop, you may note that this is official narrative from the White House now.
This may make you ponder.
It was always intended this Tier 2 pushed narrative would move to Tier 1.
“Man made pathogens” appear much more dangerous than “natural ones”
The Overton Window between Man made and natural is to keep the illusion of a spreading disease in the alternative Tier too.
The one thing that would scupper their plans is enough people understanding that 220 years of Transmission experiments have had zero successes.
https://open.substack.com/pub/drmikeyeadon/p/transmission-failure?r=j4u5j&utm_medium=ios
Thankyou and bless you Johnny for sharing your insights on these issues. It is beautiful to see the divine inspiration work through you.
As we travel down this path of understanding together and the veil falls away it is appearing a lot less likely that AIDS was naturally occurring and more likely another manufactured tool in the depopulation tool kit....and as you mentioned... What else?
When we look at the medical industry from this altitude the serpentine nature is much more apparent. The power. The wealth. The prestige. These are all cold blooded pursuits of the heartless/Godless. Psychopathic. Our present situation is understandable with these demons as "leaders". Truth is the enemy of the house of lies. Thankyou for arming us. Xx
Your words are beautiful! Thanks.
Absolutely excellent. A fantastic piece of Research. Clearly laid Out . 👍
Thanks for reading!
Incredible article Johnny!…once you move on from the UK can you do Canada? Wouldn’t surprise me if your “distinguished “ scientists were counselling our government in our Privy Council…after all we are your minions lol
Your government is probably the slimiest government on Earth. Did you read my article on Mark Carney? I suppose you probably did. I do want to spend some time on more Canadian stuff. One of my future articles will have its foot in Canada, too.
Have you looked in to Dr. David E. Martin's work?
He'd been 'screaming from the rooftops' since the whole 'Big, Bad Virus' PsyOp STARTED (DAY 1)!
And the so-called 'CV19 virus' was NOT the REAL Bio-weapon, it were the INJECTIONS that followed!
And 'CV19' did NOT.....NOT.....NOT.....'COME FROM' China!
It came from a Lab at Chapel Hill in North Carolina!
Dr David E Martin PhD Addresses European Parliament True Origins And History of SARS CoV 2 COVID-19
https://rumble.com/v2q8a86-dr-david-e-martin-phd-addresses-european-parliament-true-origins-and-histor.html
I'll have a look, but I also think the evidence that it came from China is overwhelming, and there is extra circumstantial evidence which also backs it up. I do think I had COVID in an early wave, and it was like nothing else I'd had. I came down with it the day after a man sneezed in my mouth, and when it happened, I accepted it as cause and consequence because it was so directly associated. I didn't take the vaccines, and I got ill during the supposed omicron wave. too. To be perfectly honest, neither side of this debate has convinced me of even half of what they believe. Most people tend to use clear logical fallacies instead of actual logic.
Yes, DO look in to Dr. David Martin. There's no shortage of his stuff (vids), that's out there.
Matters not that someone 'sneezed into your mouth', there is NO SUCH THING as 'viruses'. Dr. Lee Merritt has gone over this fact, just as MANY other (REAL) Doctors have. And that is what *I* learned, during the FAKE PLANNEDemic/Fake 'virus' PsyOp.....that there was no such thing as a 'virus'.
Dr. Lee Merritt......
https://rumble.com/c/LeeMerrittMD/videos
https://drleemerritt.com/
And what we call 'colds' & 'flu', is just our body detoxing from all of the toxic shit that we have in our bodies.
Thank you so much for this article - I have cited the original many times, in many contexts, the most important of which is the Covid Dossier, which is a record of the global military-intelligence coordination of the Covid event. Your research is invaluable and much appreciated!
https://debbielerman.substack.com/p/the-covid-dossier-expanded
I’m yet to be convinced otherwise.
I have. I've interviewed Kaufman, had many conversations with people like Bill Huston. But none of them have convinced me of anything. I'm still open, but saying "investigate some more" is a use of a logical fallacy. I'm probably not going to be convinced by either side because the current arguments are based solely on believing that one side is wrong, ergo, the other must be right, rather than developing a more coherent theory or any evidence whatsoever.